<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC America</title>
	<link>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/</link>
	<description>Archetypes and Personal Development - the only website make sense of them both</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 06:23:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Mary Lou Shields</title>
		<link>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-3002</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jun 2008 01:34:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-3002</guid>
					<description>Point taken. I agree.

MLou</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken. I agree.</p>
<p>MLou
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-2996</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-2996</guid>
					<description>Dear Mary Lou,

Yes, Anderson Cooper is a splendid example of good and courageous reporting.  No one could deny the importance of what he has done and continues to do.

My point is slightly different in that the thing that irks me is that US reporting can be very fine, but the tendency when there is an interview with an important person, face to face, is for the interviewer to be rather timid.  This is all the more surprising since the programs with talking heads from different political backgrounds are far less deferential, - - and much more lively.  But of course those are not always powerful figures, as they are composed of commentators and people with opinions.

It's the deference thing that makes me squirm....

Allan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mary Lou,</p>
<p>Yes, Anderson Cooper is a splendid example of good and courageous reporting.  No one could deny the importance of what he has done and continues to do.</p>
<p>My point is slightly different in that the thing that irks me is that US reporting can be very fine, but the tendency when there is an interview with an important person, face to face, is for the interviewer to be rather timid.  This is all the more surprising since the programs with talking heads from different political backgrounds are far less deferential, - - and much more lively.  But of course those are not always powerful figures, as they are composed of commentators and people with opinions.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the deference thing that makes me squirm&#8230;.</p>
<p>Allan
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Mary Lou Shields</title>
		<link>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-2995</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 12:57:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-2995</guid>
					<description>Anderson Cooper comes to mind.

During the days of Hurricane Katrina, he put himself in jeopardy as he traveled to  the places the federal government was refusing to see and  did not want us to see.

Cooper asked the tough questions and expressed his outrage at the government's failure to respond.

More than that, he gave his microphone to the people directly affected -  mostly poor, mostly black, and the many old and sick. Those who had now means to leave the city. Cooper's footage showed the world  those directly affected and he also showed the rich, white  president's &quot;flyover.&quot;

When the world responded with outrage, pressure was put on America's leaders. 

Like the best war correspondents,Cooper's reportage illuminated and mobilized.

MLou</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anderson Cooper comes to mind.</p>
<p>During the days of Hurricane Katrina, he put himself in jeopardy as he traveled to  the places the federal government was refusing to see and  did not want us to see.</p>
<p>Cooper asked the tough questions and expressed his outrage at the government&#8217;s failure to respond.</p>
<p>More than that, he gave his microphone to the people directly affected -  mostly poor, mostly black, and the many old and sick. Those who had now means to leave the city. Cooper&#8217;s footage showed the world  those directly affected and he also showed the rich, white  president&#8217;s &#8220;flyover.&#8221;</p>
<p>When the world responded with outrage, pressure was put on America&#8217;s leaders. </p>
<p>Like the best war correspondents,Cooper&#8217;s reportage illuminated and mobilized.</p>
<p>MLou
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Cathy</title>
		<link>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-2983</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 16:16:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-2983</guid>
					<description>Can't help thinking that if our journalists were less about promoting their own shows and more about getting to the truth we might be better informed and make better choices as voters etc.  Well, there's hope, at least!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t help thinking that if our journalists were less about promoting their own shows and more about getting to the truth we might be better informed and make better choices as voters etc.  Well, there&#8217;s hope, at least!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: CathyB</title>
		<link>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-2978</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jun 2008 04:49:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://allanhunter.net/blog/2008/06/13/bbc-america/#comment-2978</guid>
					<description>Totally agree.  The BBC is showing us how a journalist can be persistent for the purpose of gaining a truthful answer rather than for the purpose of creating an argument.  At this point, we need the truth.  If the interviewee refuses to answer we still know what the truth is from his evasion.  Could be the BBC World News is one of the best news broadcasts available here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Totally agree.  The BBC is showing us how a journalist can be persistent for the purpose of gaining a truthful answer rather than for the purpose of creating an argument.  At this point, we need the truth.  If the interviewee refuses to answer we still know what the truth is from his evasion.  Could be the BBC World News is one of the best news broadcasts available here.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.273 seconds -->
